patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Verizon Union Talks Continue As Court Injunction Issued For Strikers

State court orders strikers in multiple states not to block Verizon entrances, worksites or to harass fill-in workers.

 

Potential settlement talks with unions representing 45,000 Verizon wireline operations employees, including about 5,400 in New Jersey, will continue over the weekend in search of a "fair" settlement, a Verizon spokesman said on Friday afternoon.

Near the end of the first week of the strike — called in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states immediately after a previous contract expired at 11:59 p.m. last Saturday night — talks had moved back to Philadelphia for the unions representing striking workers in New Jersey and south, said Rich Young, a Verizon spokesman.

Young said he believed that demonstrators for the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, local 827, representing New Jersey, had returned twice at the end of this week to picket across North Maple Avenue from the Verizon Center, based in Basking Ridge. Young said he had heard of no problems.

However, Verizon had earlier sought an injunction against unions in multiple states against union members alleged to have blocked access to Verizon facilities, sabotaged operations and harrassed managers who have been assigned to fill in for the duties of striking wireless workers and related office personnel.

Earlier in the day, a state Superior Court judge in Sussex County issued an injunction similar to an order already issued in the past few days in New York, Pennsylvania and Delaware, Young said. He said a requested court order is pending in Massachusetts.

The order is applicable to all IBEW local 827 bargaining unit members, their dependents, minors, households and relatives, according to details on the injunction posted on the union local's website.

"IBEW, Local 827 does not condone any acts of violence, vandalism, or destruction," said a statement on the website from William D. Huber, president and business manager for that union.

Two days ago, in saying that top representatives for Verizon and the union were in New York trying to close a gap in disputed issues, Huber then said that the union had not received reports of Verizon's then-claims of vandalism and union workers' refusal to let non-union workers enter some work sites.

Huber was not available for comment late Friday afternoon.

The court injunction, which is statewide even though issued in Sussex County, advises employees that they may exercise first amendment rights to free speech, but face other restrictions.

"You may not threaten, obstruct, intimidate, or harass Verizon officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, or the general public," according to the reproduction of the injunction on the union website. "You may not block any ingress or egress of any Verizon vehicle or contractor vehicle," it added.

"This will provide clarity and enable our managers to do their jobs," Young said. 

The injunction also prohibits "acts of violence, vandalism or destruction to Verizon property, premises, or any worksite." The court order, as per the website, allows six pickets per entrance to any Verizon property, premises and worksites, including contractor worksites.

Other stipulations in the court order allow mass picketing, grouping, and congregating, but only 25 feet from any entrance, or on public streets leading to Verizon property or worksites or contractor worksites.

In previous interviews, Huber has said Verizon's management is trying to roll back the progress that the union workers have made in almost six decades of collective bargaining. Some of the negotiated issues involve safety and a Verizon plan to scrap a longstanding health plan relied on by workers and their families, he said.

Huber also said there are documented reports of Verizon's fill-in workers violating some of the union's safety rules,

Verizon has addressed its position in an online statement on bargaining with the unions, including its contention that most union-represented employees pay nothing for health insurance costs. 

"The company is proposing that its union-represented employees pay a portion of their health care premiums, much like the majority of other Verizon employees," the site said.

The two sides also are disputing whether non-union employees with temporary training are qualified to fill the union members' duties while they are on strike.

Related Topics: IBEW Local 827, Injunction, Verizon, and verizon strike

c.s.

10:10 pm on Friday, August 12, 2011

Verizon employees pay over 10% for medical benefits.Since 1984 the employees have taken smaller raises or no raise to pay for medical benefits.It was also those employees who funded and built VZ Wireless when it was N.J.Bell and Bell Atlantic.

Reply
Comment_arrow

c.s.

1:54 pm on Saturday, August 13, 2011

Cell phones aren't walkie-talkies.

Comment_arrow

Angus McDonald

2:12 pm on Saturday, August 13, 2011

Customer revenue funded wireless. Don't get me wrong, I think it's a shame that their pay and benefits now cost more than the income they generate, but you can't expect someone else to subsidize you. By going on strike instead of working without a contract, they have alienated themselves from millions of people whose unemployment benefits have run out. And their arrogance and intimidation has only served to alienate the public at large. They're fighting a battle that they will not win.

don

9:25 am on Saturday, August 13, 2011

My understanding of this is that in the face of record profit during a reccession, Verizon says that if thier Unions give them back a billion dollars more in concessions then they can still work there. What's wrong with this picture?

Reply

Lurky Loo

11:37 am on Saturday, August 13, 2011

I thought that the wireless division was seperate from their landline? Wireless employees are not union, only the landline ones are and I thought that verizon has lost more than 50% of their landline business in the last 5 years ... eventually there won't be need for landline at all or it's union employees, kinda like what the post office is getting ready to go thru now. I think people need to realize is that this has been happening in the private sector for over 3 years now and it's just now starting to catch up to all the unions. I understand standing up for what you believe in but eventually a compromise has to be worked out because the strikers can't afford to be out of work for months on end nor do they want the 'scabs' to get really good at their job as these 'scabs' were probably unemployeed before now and are probably very grateful to be working right now. I'm sure they would be more than happy to continue working with less pay and benefits than a current union employee makes. Whatever else happens, the violence needs to stop.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lynda Buckley

12:44 pm on Saturday, August 13, 2011

Verizon Wireline maintains landline phones, Fios, and ALL the fiber and equipment that makes Verizon Wireless run. So, they have EVERYTHING to do with wireless. Do you think your cell phone just magically makes other phones ring? Of course you don't. That call goes from your cell phone to a cell tower. It then goes to the base of that tower where it is then handed over to VERIZON WIRELINE so the call gets routed to wherever you may be calling. If Verizon Wireline were to somehow be turned off right now, EVERY cell phone would stop working, even if it was a cell phone from another company as there calls also get routed through Verizon Wireline.

clarke

8:51 pm on Saturday, August 13, 2011

If you look at the Verizon audited financial statements available from the Verizon website, and go to the segment note, you will see that the wireline business barely makes an operating profit on $41 billion in revenue (forget a net profit, while that figure isn't report no doubt the wireline business doesn't even cover its cost of capital). Thats pathetic and management should be doing everything it can to control costs, the shareholders of Verizon own the business, not the unions.

There are 14+ million unemployed in America these days, these union people should be ready to be replaced on a permanent basis if necessary.

Reply
Comment_arrow

c.s.

9:01 pm on Saturday, August 13, 2011

Fios and Optic Fiber are not considered wirelines.

Comment_arrow

Lynda Buckley

10:05 pm on Saturday, August 13, 2011

Clarke. Clarke, clarke, clarke. You sound very anti-union, Clarke. If there were only 6 million unemployed people in this country, would that make it better? 634,000? What does the number mean, Clarke? That isn't the issue here. The issue is that the CEO makes $55,000 a day, Clarke. The issue is that $55,000 is my base salary, Clarke. So I suppose I'm one of those union people that should be ready to be replaced because I want a decent contract, Clarke. Because I want a decent wage, Clarke. A decent wage for building the Fios network and for maintaining it, Clarke, so that the company (of which I am a shareholder) can make lots and lots of money, Clarke.

Comment_arrow

Lynda Buckley

10:06 pm on Saturday, August 13, 2011

Part Two (since I couldn't fit everything in my first post) - Why can't I and my union brothers and sisters have a piece of that pie, Clarke? Should it only be the people at the top that benefit from the hard work, Clarke? If you knew how hard I worked and how much family life I've missed, maybe you wouldn't be so quick to dismiss me and my fellow workers. But that means nothing, right, Clarke, because there are 14 million OTHER people that are unemployed as well. Is that what you're saying, Clarke? And undestand this, Clarke, Verizon has many many people to spin factors and data to appear the way they want it. I've seen how they spin 'information' for 16 years, Clarke. Clarke, let me tell you something else: the company says their wireline business is down, and that they lose voice lines (wireline) all the time. This isn't correct, since those lines are merely migrated from copper to fiber optic and they are still getting paid for that line. Thank you for your time.

clarke

10:39 pm on Saturday, August 13, 2011

buck0516 - I see the data that is audited by an independent party and that data shows that on $41 billion in revenue, wireline segment makes less than a billion in operating profit. Operating profit doesn't include interest on debt, corporate costs, taxes and other charges. Accordingly, the wireline business is one that needs to be rationalized seriously.

It comes down to can the company make a decent return for its owners (shareholders) or not? If not, then time to pursure another strategy.

You and your unions are the ones who have chosen to walk off the job, live with the responsibility for your own decisions and what ultimately happens to you, your job and your union. Its your choice, your responsibility and your life. Deal with it.

If some of the 14 million unemployed decide they can do your job and do it for less, tough luck for you.

Reply
Comment_arrow

c.s.

10:52 pm on Saturday, August 13, 2011

Somebody want to cut my lawn,no tax of course?

Comment_arrow

CommonSense

10:01 pm on Wednesday, August 17, 2011

bucky, with all due respect, you are somewhat pathetic. Have you ever heard of the free market system. I guess you, Obama and Lenin believe that you and Seidenberg should all be paid the same. Interestingly Seidenberg started in the man-holes as well, but had sufiicient skills to ascend. The reason he makes 55K a day is because the directors couldn't find anyone else to reap Verizon's hefty profits for 54K a day. God bless him. While your network backbone argument is interesting, it is specious. Wireless is a separate company, half owned by the Brits and they pay VZ to drive their traffic, period. Com dumped lots of dough into FIOS and has not seen much return. And finally: free healthcare?? what socialist planet do you live on. EVERYONE in private industry pays for their healthcare.

One of the best things about our country is that you can always say "shove it!" if you don't like your deal. The union should either get real and take their deal, or go find a better one. good luck with that.

clarke

10:45 pm on Saturday, August 13, 2011

Buck0516 - I also suggest you drop the class warfare stuff. If you want to be CEO, go get an appropriate education, work your way up and do what needs to get done to be CEO. Until you have the skills to be a CEO you shouldn't really go there, because its an argument that shows you know little about what it takes to be a CEO.

Reply

Lynda Buckley

11:33 pm on Saturday, August 13, 2011

Class warfare? I never mentioned that. You seem to have a serious disconnect from the middle class reality. Verizon had a 6 BILLION dollar profit and does NOT pay taxes. Do you know what it takes to be a CEO, Clarke? And is it worth $55,000 a day? Is it worth that when 14 million are out of work? I wonder if you asked that CEO what he would be willing to give back and sacrifice, what his answer would be? Do you know anyone who should get $55,000 a day when the economy is in the crapper? And if you say a CEO who 'leads' a company to make 6 billion in this economy, I'll ask you again, why shouldn't the workers who made it possible, also benefit from this? If Verizon needs to make cuts, they should start at the top. After all, if there is no middle class America, who could afford $100 a month to watch FiOs? Verizon is sitting on $100 billion in revenue and showing net profits of $6 billion last year. Verizon’s Chairman is paid 300 times what an average worker earns and he is set to receive $36.75 million dollars this year in total compensation that doesn’t include the rise in his stock, which currently has an estimated value of $76.5 million. He will make more than $100,000 PER DAY! But what you think is middle class should continue to bend over and take it and not fight for what they deserve. Sorry Clark, I won't do that and will fight to keep what I and other working middle class deserve - why is that so wrong. Why isn't Corporate Greed wrong?

Reply

clarke

9:51 am on Sunday, August 14, 2011

Your obsession with executive compensation is pathetic. If you don't like your wage, go work someplace else, its a free country. I am sure you can find better elsewhere.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lynda Buckley

2:42 pm on Sunday, August 14, 2011

No, not obsessed at all. The fact is the wireless network which is generating all the company’s profit, rides the same network as its wireline portion. There is only one network. It’s only wireless until you hit the first cell tower. So while wireline is labeled as “struggling”, it’s actually doing all the support and maintenance work for the wireless division, but getting none of the profits; therefore, looking like it’s “struggling.” Wireless gets a free ride off the Verizon network. So in essence I am also a part in supporting the wireless division as well as running the fiber optics for Fios. With the billions of dollars in profits, in which I am a part of the company acheiving, should not be asking for the 100 concessions they are demanding from the workers.

Lynda Buckley

3:28 pm on Sunday, August 14, 2011

Yes it is a free country. I'm just trying to hold onto what I have to support my family. I work hard everyday as most middle Americans do. However, this country is in a crisis. Jobs are being sent overseas. My wife has recently lost her job due to the book manufacturing business struggling to compete with Asian manufacturers. How can Americans compete with some one who most likely makes $0.20 per hour? What is happening to the middle class makes my stomach turn and we are the ones who support the local and government programs. I am fighting to keep what I have as a hard working American. I am not asking for anything more, just a fair contract. And Verizon demanding for 100 concessions is not fair. America's middle class is quickly becoming smaller and America's poverty class is rapidly becoming larger. One day middle class America will wake up and I won't be surprised if we see the same riots happening in Greece, also happening here in the United States. If what I believe in and stand for makes me "pathetic" - then I guess I am, Clarke.

Reply

EL Diablo

6:26 pm on Sunday, August 14, 2011

verizon is putting the public and these unskilled scabs and managers in danger.seeing these replacements attempt do this work is scary.............for your safety i suggest everyone stay clear of verizon scab workers,until this strike is over................

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lurky Loo

11:46 am on Monday, August 15, 2011

Verizon is NOT putting us in danger...the strikers are and there is no justification for the violence, throwing your children in front of ANY vehicle, cutting cable lines, flattening tires and the stalking of workers at people's homes when they are trying to work. They are responsible for their own actions!

clarke

9:01 pm on Sunday, August 14, 2011

I find it really difficult to believe that the wireless segment is not charged for cost of access from the wireline business especially since 45% of the wireless business is owned by Vodaphone. Do you think for a minute that Verizon would eat 100% of the expenses of access to the network from the wireless side and only keep 55% of the revenue? Oh please.

As for your claim on who pays most of the income taxes in this country, I suggest you take a look at who is paying the vast majority of the income taxes, and its not the middle class, most who are paying very little in income taxes. The IRS recently released its 2009 data, you should check it out.

Reply
Comment_arrow

c.s.

11:27 am on Monday, August 15, 2011

Verizon is a fantastic company.

Comment_arrow

Lurky Loo

2:47 pm on Monday, August 15, 2011

Yes Verizon IS a fantastic company. Certainly much better than their striking workers. I mean really, does someone really have to tell you not to throw feces?? Unbelievable, I hope they all get fired and their scabs get their jobs. People are disgusting! http://nation.foxnews.com/unions-protests/2011/08/15/verizon-strikers-instructed-not-throw-feces

clarke

7:36 pm on Monday, August 15, 2011

Only classy people throw feces, drop nails, glass and other puncture devices, didn't you know that???

Reply

cv

11:17 am on Thursday, August 18, 2011

I think the biggest problem is that verizon want to take retirees benefits way. We are all in a bad situation with benefits at this point in time. I think its time to reach an affordable agreement and move on. With rising health costs and people living longer alot of companies cannot sustain the benefit packages. It is a very harsh reality but verizon employees will feel the very real pain of the masses.

Reply

Lynda Buckley

4:22 pm on Thursday, August 18, 2011

Although Verizon would like you to believe it's only about benefits and salaries, they are demanding 98 other concessions. All I keep hearing Verizon talk about is benefits and salaries. If that is the case then they should remove the other 98 concessions and negotiate the other 2 in good faith. The union is willing to negotiate. Here are a list of some of the other concessions: Wages - both annual and progression increases tied to your yearly evaluation, Eliminate Differentials, Eliminate Pay Premiums, Eliminate all Overtime Caps, Create new job titles for the consumer and business call centers that would work on a commission based wage schedule, Pensions: Eliminate the Pension Plan, Eliminate the Pension Cash-Out option, Eliminate the Sickness Death Benefit, Benefits: Eliminate accident disability benefits and cut in half the sickness disability benefits, Reduce or eliminate sick time pay, Reduce Paid Holidays, Job Security: Eliminate the Job Security Provisions for all employees, Eliminate the 35-mile transfer provision, Eliminate provisions in Force Adjustment Plan, Eliminate New Contracting Initiatives allowing them to increase the level of contracting, and the list goes on and on.

Reply

Lynda Buckley

4:28 pm on Thursday, August 18, 2011

There are 45,000 people on strike. I am one of them. The union nor I condone any criminal behavior while walking the picket lines. Out of 45,000 people, of course there will be a few bad apples. Instead of grouping us all together and calling us thugs, why don't you talk to these people when you see them picketing. I'm sure you will find out you are completely wrong. They are just a bunch of people fighting for a fair contract, that has more to do with just salaries and benefits.

Reply

clarke

7:26 pm on Thursday, August 18, 2011

Buck0516 - what exactly is wrong with a salary increase tied to a performance evaluation? I assume that if you do your job to a high level you will receive a pay raise, if you don't then you don't deserve a pay raise and potentially should be considered for termination.

I am not close enough to the other concessions you list out to be able to comment on them but some of them seem fairly minor with others sounding much more consequential. What do you mean when you refer to "elimiinate all overtime caps"?

Does that mean you can work as much O-T as you want? When you say reduce paid holidays, well how many paid holidays do you currently receive? Most employees at big companies I know of get 10 or 11 a year. As for job security, most employees have none, why should you guys be any different?

Help the rest of us understand why we should stand up and be supportive of you folks?

Reply

Lynda Buckley

1:44 am on Friday, August 19, 2011

Salary increase tied to a performance evaluation - that all depends on who is evaluating me and what guidelines they are using. The union is still trying to get info from the company to more clearly define this concession. I personally have a problem with this. My immediate suppervisor as well as most others are not trained in doing the work that I do. As I'm sure you may know, you can put a person in a position of a manager to manage people without being qualified to do the person's job. The managers have just gone through training to "fill" in for the technicians in the event of a strike and are still struggling out there as we speak. None of the managers were ever trained in how to install Fios. We currently get 10 paid holidays, the company is looking to eliminate MLK and Veterans day. As for job security, nothing will be keeping the company from outsourceing jobs overseas. So if you have trouble with your phone or need to talk to someone at Verizon, be prepared to talk to someone in India. We should be keeping jobs here in America. Not outsourceing them. No, we do not work as much OT as we want. Again, these are just a few out of the 100 concessions that Verizon is demanding. Our union is trying to obtain and supply documentation from Verizon supporting these concessions. They have failed to do so almost two weeks into the strike. All we are asking for is for the company to negotiate in good faith.

Reply

cv

8:13 am on Friday, August 19, 2011

Buck thank you for the clarification.

Reply

clarke

10:39 am on Friday, August 19, 2011

In the real world there is an agreed upon criteria in advance for performance evaluations. You know in advance what your goals and objectives are and if you meet them, great, if you don't then its your own problem.

10 holidays seems fine, if they want to get rid of MLK and veterans day then they should give you 2 floating holiday days instead. Most of the country doesn't get those 2 days off but common practice is to get floater days you can use at your own discretion.

Like it or not, the tech support we get from folks in India, Singapore and elsewhere isn't all that bad, you need to get over that point.

What are some of the other issues? These that you point out seem pretty minor and easily agreed to.

Reply
Comment_arrow

EL Diablo

7:48 am on Saturday, August 20, 2011

agreed upon criteria means nothing to verizon management.they do whatever they want and tell you to grieve it and tie up your pay for two years.2 floating days sounds good,but you could not use them on a monday or friday only when the all mighty verizon allows you,how about wed.overtime caps /if the workload is heavy workers must work 10 or 15hours overtime depending on what month it is.verizon wants to remove those overtime caps.so if you worked your 10 or 15 extra hours in a week,they could just pile work on you and demand you finish it or sit home next week and not get paid.while extra workers sit home on a verizon scheduled day off who want to come in for overtime but will not be called in.so if you coach little league,or have a funeral to go to it will all have to wait ,until the days worth of extra work is complete.

Joe Samanich

9:56 am on Saturday, August 20, 2011

Buck, Clarke sounds like he is jealous of union workers. He forgets that it was unions that pushed for a 5 day work week, vacations, etc. He probably works more than 40 hours due to the power that companies now have as unions disappear, fearing losing their jobs if they don't. Even Verizon managers now have to take their company cell phones and laptops on vacation, giving the all mighty Verizon sway over their "free time". $55,000.00 a day is ludicrous, no one person should be making that type of money. Clarke, protector of the over paid corporate leeches, these so called "leaders"are arrogant, money grubbing jerks. They use every tax loophole to get the taxes that they pay, down to 15% or less. They constantly send jobs overseas so they can continue to get their mega pay. As far as Siedenberg working his way up, he was put on the fast track, doing underground work under the Grand Concourse in the Bronx due to the fact he couldn't pass, what was then known as switchman, test. By the way, Clarke are you one of those so called, "executives" or just a worker bee being used by by them?

Reply

clarke

8:19 pm on Saturday, August 20, 2011

Clarks is self employed little Joey. Do you know what that means? It means Clarke pays 100% of his healthcare, Clarke pays for 100% of his "retirement", it means Clarke not only gets to pay the employee portion of FICA, but also the employer portion, and there is no limit on compensation that Clarke gets to pay about 15% on vs $108,000 cap for employees.

So whine away about getting your healthcare paid for 100% by the company, your retirement paid for by the company. You generate no sympathy and deserve none.

Reply

Lynda Buckley

10:31 pm on Saturday, August 20, 2011

Well that explains a lot. As per your own words: You don't like your job, go work someplace else, it's a free country.

Reply

clarke

9:59 am on Sunday, August 21, 2011

Actually Bucky, what it means is that people that actually carry their own water have no sympthy for folks like you. I love what I do and wouldn't trade it for anything else in the world.

I am also glad your little strike was a failure, now get back to work.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe Samanich

11:12 am on Sunday, August 21, 2011

Clarkie, Clarkie, Clarkie, so your self employed but still hate unions and happy you don't have to pay them. But running your own whatever, do most pay you cash? Are you one of the great underground economy. Hmm could be. I pay part of my medical as a retiree. Yes, the CWA and the IBEW should pay part also as most everybody today does. But they do have some bennies that should not be taken away. Verizon has been trying to go non union for a long time. But they do lie, Clarkie, when they talk about losing money on the wireline end of the business. Contrary to most folks thinking that wireless is truly wireless is, well BS. After coming off a cellular tower it goes to wire, through wire in the Central Offices and out to another tower. So Verizon making everyone think they need cellular phones is both a myth and job killing. Cellular has a very long way to go to be truly wireless. Clarkie, do you know that those IBEW workers keep land lines running, and cellular, in the CO's by maintaining the plant and the power that is needed to run all phones. Do you know that if their are power outages most cell sites have no backup power. Hence no cellular service. If you buy into FIOS, you have a battery on your house that you are responsible for. With the IBEW folks in the CO's, when power is lost, they make sure that the diesel engine kicks in for many hours of backup followed by hours of battery power. With FIOS and cellular you are on your own. Hoping your closest tower has a generator

Lynda Buckley

10:43 am on Sunday, August 21, 2011

Get mentality - if I don't have, then nobody else should. The strike was a failure? We've been asking to work under the old contract while the new one was being negotiated from day one. Verizon and their "trained" management couldn't handle the workload and they needed us to come back. Please - get a clue. Better yet, dont - ignorance is bliss.

Reply

Joe Samanich

11:31 am on Sunday, August 21, 2011

Or that you have that spare battery at home for your FIOS. With wireline you don't have these problems. Have you dealt with the wonderful Verizon services of outsourced jobs that are in Mid-Far East? A sure time waster. Please, Americans don't carry translators in those languages in their pockets. Also, many Verizon management today, never worked in any of the craft jobs the company has. They have no clue. It's nice that you work by yourself (self preservation not having to deal with others working for you?), baring any economic turn downs, which preclude folks paying you. No union protection. Yes you are still jealous, because unions fight to keep folks in jobs here in the " great"? USofA. Your job is always in jeopardy due to economic situations, such as now and probably going forward as America becomes # 2 or more to China and India, etc. Where our "great" business "leaders" have sent our jobs to.

Reply

clarke

6:00 pm on Sunday, August 21, 2011

Joey, perhaps you should go read the SEC filings, the wireline business barely earns an operating profit on a huge revenue number, $41 billion if I recall. The wirelesss busienss is owned something like 45% by Vodaphone. I meet alot of people who don't even bother having a land line, most people consider it a waste of money and who can blame them. So its completely understandable that Verizon needs to get its costs in line with its shrinking business model, The shareholders own the business, not the unions.

Reply

Leave a comment