Affordable Housing Fight Goes Back to the Courts

Housing advocate and municipalities try to prevent the state from taking their funds.

The battle between the Christie administration and the Fair Share Housing Center continues.

This time, the two sides are going to court Friday over as much as $200 million in local affordable housing trust funds.

So far, the Appellate Division of Superior Court has been kind to the Cherry Hill-based housing advocates, but this case could be a different story.

To help balance the budget, Gov. Chris Christie recommended the state use the trust fund money. The administration appears to be within its legal right to do so, as the law creating the funds—and the developer fees that municipalities levy to subsidize them—specified municipalities had to “commit to spend” the money within four years. The clock strikes midnight on July 17.

But as always, there are caveats.

Last Friday, the New Jersey State League of Municipalities filed a brief in support of the Fair Share case, averring that the state has never defined what “commit to spend” means.

“It is patently unfair to take this money from towns without first giving them the rules of the game,” League Executive Director Bill Dressel said. “Towns have asked the state time and again what they need to do to protect these funds that are dedicated to affordable housing. The state has consistently refused to tell them.”

That statement gets to the bigger problem: With the abolition of the state Council on Affordable Housing—ruled improper by the court—affordable housing is at a standstill.

Christie has made no bones about his feelings for COAH. Neither have just about every other municipal official and state legislator.

The state Supreme Court’s Mount Laurel decisions, which led to the creation of COAH in 1985 to oversee the process by which all municipalities would provide their “fair share” of affordable housing for the state, continue to be politically unpopular.

Some communities refused to buy into the COAH process and took their chances in the courts, often winding up having to take huge housing developments with smaller amounts of low- and moderate-income units under the so-called “builder’s remedy.”

But more than 300 did follow the council’s process and were in various stages of conformance when COAH went kaput.

Christie sought early on to stop COAH for 90 days through an executive order, but Fair Share went to court. The appellate division ruled the governor isn’t that powerful and Christie withdrew his order.

A year later, the governor issued a reorganization plan abolishing COAH. That drew the same court action from Fair Share and met the same reaction from the appellate division.

The Legislature feels the same way as the governor and passed legislation getting rid of COAH and setting up different housing rules, but Christie conditionally vetoed it and Democratic lawmakers did not agree with his terms.

So while COAH should exist, it remains division non grata.

Much of the problem was politically created, driven by municipalities that did not want to let affordable housing into their communities. The Legislature created COAH in reaction to the court’s rulings, and at one time or another, its rules included all sorts of work-arounds, including provisions for municipalities to pay other communities to take their low-income housing obligations.

With new rules proposed, and challenged in court, twice since its creation, COAH’s regulations rival those of the IRS. Chatham’s last housing plan filed with the council totaled 79 pages.

It’s hard to argue with the language in Christie’s first, rescinded, executive order: “the burdensome procedures governing the provision of affordable housing in New Jersey for those with low and moderate income developed by COAH are excessively complex and unworkable, resulting in delays, inefficiencies, litigation and unreasonable costs to municipalities and the private sector without appreciable progress being made for our citizens.”

But it’s also hard to argue that there is a critical need for affordable housing in a state with a high cost of living, high cost of housing and the high property taxes.

Taking away municipal affordable housing funds without a statewide plan to spend the money to build low-cost housing is not going to solve the problem.

Colleen O'Dea is a writer, editor, researcher, data analyst, web page designer and mapper with nearly three decades in the news business. Her column appears weekly.

Affordable housing status

The amounts collected, spent, remaining and in danger of reverting to the state as of June 2012 and the municipality's status with the Council on Affordable Housing or in the courts as of 2010-11. The following are municipalities in Patch's coverage area in Morris, Passaic, Somerset and Sussex counties:

Municipality County Funds collected  Funds spent Funds balance Reverting to State July 17 Status  Chatham Twp. Morris $0 $0 $0 $0 COAH petition Kinnelon Morris $0 $0 $0 $0 COAH petition Mendham Twp. Morris $0 $0 $0 $0 COAH expired Montville Morris $966 $0 $966 $0 COAH petition Morris Plains Morris $0 $0 $0 $0 Court builders remedy Morris Twp. Morris $130 $0 $130 $0 COAH petition Morristown Morris $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Chatham   Morris  $310,626 $161,932 $148,694 $37,776 COAH filing Chester   Morris  $937,380 $31,711 $905,670 $822,053 COAH petition Chester Twp. Morris  $1,902,517 $1,144,737 $757,780 $453,845 COAH petition Jefferson Morris  $83,038 $0 $83,038 $79,812 COAH expired Madison Morris  $692,401 $234,273 $458,128 $89,934 COAH petition Mendham   Morris  $575,272 $464,065 $111,207 $0 COAH petition Parsippany Morris  $6,397,139 $1,610,162 $4,786,977 $3,280,134 COAH petition Washington Twp. Morris  $3,065,438 $2,275,561 $789,877 $150,372 COAH certified Bloomingdale  Passaic $0 $0 $0 $0 Court builders remedy Wayne Passaic $3,740,059 $2,268,123 $1,471,936 $1,118,849 COAH re-petition Bernards Somerset $11,157,357 $9,707,544 $1,449,813 $289,827 COAH certified Bridgewater Somerset $11,234,905 $6,141,747 $5,093,158 $4,387,670 COAH petition Green Brook Somerset $444,496 $87,242 $357,254 $256,262 Court declaratory judgement Hillsborough Somerset $4,045,341 $424,945 $3,620,396 $2,106,315 Court declaratory judgement Warren Twp. Somerset $7,600,817 $2,531,756 $5,069,060 $4,184,860 COAH petition Watchung Somerset $1,873,904 $1,245,273 $628,631 $387,322 COAH petition Hopatcong Sussex $120,580 $0 $120,580 $69,272 COAH expired

Source: N.J. Department of Community Affairs

Fed up July 30, 2012 at 06:06 PM
Hah! You think this is bad. Too bad people don't know about the tens of thousands of elderly immigrants that come here and live rent-free in apts. under Section 8 Housing retired taxpayers could certainly use and deserve!
Bill August 24, 2012 at 11:57 AM
I too live in a complex that has a section for affordable housineg. Problem is, I pay the whole Association Fee and Mt. Laurel folks pay 1/3. So the state isn't responsible, individual home owners within this complex are paying for the Mt. Laurel affordable folks. I live in a market value house, and now that I'm retired, I still have to pay for the folks who now are probably making more than me. I should be able to claim these people as dependents.
S.G. August 24, 2012 at 12:25 PM
Mr. Maxim, please explain how this is related to Liberal beliefs and, if so, why that would be negative? If you had a child just out of college or a senior family member living on SS, would you object to them living in affordable housing? BTW, I don't support the distorted form of COAH that I have seen for many years.
Maxim Sapozhnikov August 24, 2012 at 12:31 PM
Mr/Mrs. S.G., I object to anyone leeching off the society. One who cannot afford paying market value for the residence (which, by the way, will decrease when AH is gutted) should either move to cheaper areas or, in a truly desperate situation such as medical handicap, apply for Section VIII.
John Davidson October 31, 2012 at 11:57 AM
This might not be the ideal place to request this, but I’m trying to find a FREE House Plans online and have no method to find out who is the very best. I uncovered this website which is I find reliable and wanted to see if any person has any reviews on them. SDS CAD. http://www.100freehouseplans.com/ Please help me with this as my wife and I have been struggling to find a good/reliable site to obtain affordable and even FREE house designs


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »